en ENGLISH
eISSN: 2083-8441
ISSN: 2081-237X
Pediatric Endocrinology Diabetes and Metabolism
Bieżący numer Archiwum Artykuły zaakceptowane O czasopiśmie Suplementy Rada naukowa Recenzenci Bazy indeksacyjne Prenumerata Kontakt Zasady publikacji prac Opłaty publikacyjne Standardy etyczne i procedury
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2023
vol. 29
 
Poleć ten artykuł:
Udostępnij:
Artykuł przeglądowy

Cukrzyca typu 1 – co nowego w profilaktyce i terapii?

Aleksandra Pilśniak
1
,
Ewa Otto-Buczkowska
2

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Autoimmune and Metabolic Diseases, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
  2. Medical Specialist Centre in Gliwice, Poland
Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab 2023; 29 (3): 196-201
Data publikacji online: 2023/10/23
Plik artykułu:
Pobierz cytowanie
 
Metryki PlumX:
 

Introduction

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is an autoimmune disorder, and insulin deficiency is the result of β-cell dysfunction. In type 1 diabetes, cells are destroyed by autoimmune processes that are related to genetic predisposition and the action of environmental factors. The genetic predisposition of the organism is related to the HLA gene complex located on the shorter arm of the 6p21 chromosome (IDDM1). The main role of allelic variation of the HLA-DRB1, HLA-DQA1, and HLA-DQB1 class II loci has been established [1]. Analysis of the entire human genome using a mapping technique identified other sites associated with type 1 diabetes. Regulatory lymphocytes (Treg) play a role in controlling immune responses; however, despite many research programs, it has not been possible to establish the mechanisms responsible for losing immune control over these lymphocytes. Treatment of type 1 diabetes requires constant parenteral insulin administration, which can be very burdensome for the patient. Moreover, even very careful use of insulin therapy does not protect the patient against complications. Hence, the search for other methods of treatment as well as ways of preventing the onset of diabetes has been going on for a long time. Several international programs were conducted to establish risk indicators for diabetes. These studies concerned both genetic and environmental indicators. An extensive review of the research on the mechanisms leading to the development of diabetes was recently presented by Klak et al. [2]. The sequence of processes leading to the eventual destruction of β cells is not definitively clear. Among the factors responsible for activating the processes of autoimmunity, dietary factors, viral infections, etc. were taken into account [36]. A review of the research on the mechanisms of β-cell death in diabetes was recently presented by Mukherjee et al. [7]. Autoantibodies appearing in type 1 diabetes are believed to be humoral indicators of β-cell destruction. Several β-cell antigens that can stimulate antibody production are already known, but it is worth emphasizing that there is a group of type 1 diabetes mellitus in which no autoantibodies are found. During the development of type 1 diabetes, several phases can be distinguished, in which the presence of various markers of the ongoing disease process is characteristic. The dynamics of these changes can be very different, which determines the period of clinical manifestation of diabetes. The first phase is the period of the genetic predisposition of the organism. The diagnosis of this period may be based on genetic tests. The genetic risk score (GRS) for type 1 diabetes is now available to facilitate the integration of complex genetic information, disease prognosis and prediction, and response to preventive and therapeutic interventions [8]. The second phase is the period when, as a result of various factors, the process of β-cell destruction begins in the body. It is manifested by the appearance of autoantibodies directed against the antigens of these cells. It is assumed that infectious agents, mainly viruses, nutrients, and various toxic substances, may be the “triggers” of these destruction processes. Destruction of approximately 90% of the β cells leads to clinically manifest diabetes. A discussion of the research on this issue was recently presented by Wong and Tree [9, 10]. In their article, they presented a set of 4 review articles that cover new findings presented at the 2018 Immunology of Diabetes Society meeting in London [9]. In the second paper, they presented further insights into the generation of post-translationally modified peptides [10]. Quinn et al. in their review presented the evidence to date supporting pathways from relationship to causation in all stages of type 1 diabetes (seroconversion to β cell failure) [11].

Prevention of type 1 diabetes

Simultaneously with the search for methods of better and better treatment of type 1 diabetes, work is underway on methods to prevent its occurrence [1214]. In the context of type 1 diabetes prevention, we can divide the activities into primary prevention, i.e. prevention of autoimmunity, and secondary prevention, i.e. prevention of overt hyperglycaemia in people with established autoimmunity and intervention studies aimed at preserving C-peptide [12]. We also distinguish tertiary prevention, which focuses on the complications of the disease, and its main goal is to delay their occurrence [15]. Primary prevention conducted in the period when the process of autoaggression against β cells has not yet started consists of the modification of risk factors that predispose their activation. The main obstacle in the implementation of this task is the need to identify people at risk of developing diabetes before the start of autoimmunity. It turned out to be difficult due to the low specificity of the genotypes. The increasing incidence of type 1 diabetes suggests that unknown environmental factors play a role in its pathogenesis. Abel and Fav’s study of prenatal and early life factors suggests that factors influencing the skin or gut microbiome may play a greater role than infections and factors influencing the microbiome in other places [16]. Research on the influence of the microbiome on DM1 development may provide insight into the development of safe strategies for modulating immune regulation in infants and children. Kordonouri et al. showed that certain bacterial infections may increase the risk of autoantibodies and the development of type 1 diabetes. In that study poor support was shown for viral infections [17]. Caramalho et al. in their study showed that bacterial product lipopolysaccharide (LPS) promotes the expansion and enhances the function of disease-preventive Treg [18]. In turn, Filipi et al. indicated that TLR2 stimulation in a naive context or after viral infection conferred protection against autoimmune diabetes [19]. The potential role of infection in the pathogenesis of DM1 has resulted in the development of research on vaccination, not only against viruses but also on vaccines inducing immune tolerance to beta-cell antigens [2022]. Results from Hoyne et al. revealed a role for peripheral T cell anergy in organ-specific self-tolerance [23]. On the other hand, Hortani et al. in their study showed that mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy can prevent the incidence of diabetes associated with immune checkpoint cancer therapy and may be worth further consideration for new adjuvant cell therapy [24]. Moreover, dendritic cells were checked as a therapeutic alternative in the treatment of type 1 diabetes [25]. Clinical trials are also undertaken, but for now, they are scientific research [2629]. Secondary prevention concerns the preclinical period, and possibly the period immediately after the onset of the disease [30, 31]. Recently, an extensive discussion of this issue was presented by Toren et al. [32]. They underlined in their research β-cell vulnerability, heterogeneity, and contributions to the pathophysiology of T1DM and described pathways that can potentially be exploited to delay T1DM [32]. The evaluation of the results of experimental studies is difficult due to the differences between human antibodies and those of experimental animals; hence, there are attempts to develop a new model of humanized mice to conduct research on the use of immunotherapy in the treatment of type 1 diabetes [33]. Research on the use of late secondary prevention in people who develop glucose tolerance disorders or in the early period after the onset of type 1 diabetes is at the most advanced stage. Promising results of secondary prevention of type 1 diabetes are related to the use of stimulated immunomodulation in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes [34]. Marek-Trzonkowska et al. presented the results of research on obtaining regulatory T cells from conventional T lymphocytes isolated from peripheral blood in children with type 1 diabetes. At the same time, changes in the expression of selected genes important for the functions of these cells during the generation of Tregs were assessed [35]. The authors showed that the administration of Tregs is safe and tolerable in children with recent-onset type 1 diabetes. Attempts are being made in experimental studies to use the suppressor effect of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) to inhibit the immune response [36, 37]. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells are a heterogeneous population of immature cells with immunosuppressive abilities. Recently, there have been many reports on the use of antibodies (anti-CD3 antibodies like teplizumab or otelixizumab) in the prevention of the development of type 1 diabetes [38, 39]. There are also numerous attempts by bioengineered β cells to stimulate the growth and differentiation of β cells and inhibit apoptosis processes [4043].

Gene therapy

Gene therapy is another attempt at an alternative treatment and prevention of type 1 diabetes. Studies on this therapy are performed in animal models; therefore, safety in humans has not yet been established. Work on this therapy consists of overexpression of genes and proteins needed against T1DM, transplantation of cells that express the gene against T1DM, stem cell-mediated gene therapy, genetic vaccination, immune precursor cells, gene therapy, and vectors [44]. Chellappan et al. in their review discuss the essential genes and proteins that can be overexpressed for the treatment of DM1 through gene therapy [44]. Cell transplants expressing genes against T1DM and genetic vaccinations have been reviewed, which also show promise in the treatment of T1DM. Moreover, immunological interventions using gene therapy have been described, which are also potentially therapeutic approaches for T1DM. Several viral and non-viral vector systems are also discussed, with each system having its own advantages and limitations [44]. The main problem is finding methods for the safe transfer of therapeutic genes into cells [45]. Gene therapy still requires further research.

Treatment of type 1 diabetes

Insulin

From its discovery (100 years ago) to the present day, insulin has remained the mainstay of treatment for type 1 diabetes. However, exogenous insulin is still not able to completely mimic the physiological insulin secretion profile. Therefore, concepts based on its administration via the oral or inhalation route are emerging [46]. Khan et al. in their systematic review found that inhaled insulin is as effective as subcutaneous insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes. Inhaled insulin resulted in less weight gain, fewer episodes of hypoglycaemia were observed, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events. On the other hand, it has a very short duration of action, so it should not be used alone, but in this case with other basal insulins [47].

Pancreas transplants

Pancreas transplantation is the oldest alternative treatment for diabetes. Transplants began in the 1960s and were performed mainly in patients with diabetes and end-stage renal failure. The pancreas was usually transplanted simultaneously with the kidney. The problem in the development of this method of procedure was not only the difficulty in obtaining a suitable organ for transplantation, and the fact that pancreatic transplantation is relatively technically difficult due to its structure and location, but also due to the need to use aggressive immunosuppression. Immunosuppressive therapy of pancreas transplantation consists of induction with depleting antibodies and maintenance with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroids [48]. The introduction of new procedures of immunosuppressive therapy has significantly improved the effects of transplantation; however, such treatment is still burdened with high risk. An alternative to the difficult and expensive pancreatic transplantation is a much less expensive and simpler method of transplanting isolated pancreatic islets or β cells. The first isolation of pancreatic islets was performed by a Pole, Prof. S. Moskalewski, in 1965 [49]. Treatment of diabetes mellitus should be optimized first in patients being considered for pancreatic transplantation. Pancreatic transplantation can be a form of treatment in patients with irreversible complications of diabetes, such as diabetic nephropathy [50]. It is now a more and more widely used treatment in adult patients (>18 years old) with T1D of 5 or more years and experiencing unrecognized severe hypoglycaemic episodes [5154]. Human islet isolation and purification require a multi-step process to extract the small islet fraction. Enzymatic digestion, controlled gentle mechanical shear, purification, and culture is the established approach to preparation of a final enriched islet cell product that is considered safe for intra-portal infusion of the recipient’s liver [55]. The problem, however, is still obtaining cells for transplantation, as well as their protection against destruction processes after transplantation [5659]. Recently, an extensive discussion of methods for harvesting cells in animal models has also been presented [60, 61]. The use of both pancreatic and islet transplants is limited due to the small number of deceased donors. Pigs represent one promising renewable source of islets [62]. Clinical attempts to stop the destruction of self β cells by the use of monoclonal antibodies and other factors inhibiting autoimmune processes, as well as blocking immunization processes in relation to transplanted cells, are more and more widely undertaken.

Insulin therapy

The artificial pancreas or automatic insulin delivery system/closed loop system/ bionic pancreas is a system consisting of 3 parts, which include a continuous glucose monitoring system, an insulin pump, and a program stored on the pump or smartphone. The continuous glucose monitoring system tracks your glucose levels with a subcutaneous sensor. The sensor sends information to a program stored on a smartphone or to an insulin infusion pump. So, this system monitors blood glucose, calculates the amount of insulin needed at different times of the day, and delivers it. Most hybrid systems require counting and entering the amount of carbohydrates consumed during a meal [6365]. Currently, scientists are also working on a dual-hormone system that uses insulin to lower glucose levels and glucagon to raise them. Using 2 hormones to control blood glucose levels is similar to the pancreas in people without diabetes. These systems may be able to closely control glucose levels without causing hypoglycaemia [66].

Immunotherapy

Attention should be paid to the immunotherapy of type 1 diabetes, which is the subject of intensive research. Immunotherapy is designed to keep the disease in a pre-symptomatic stage, preserving residual β-cell function in people with recent-onset type 1 diabetes. Teplizumab, an anti-CD3 antibody, has shown a significant delay in disease progression as an immunomodulatory drug in high-risk individuals before clinical onset [67, 68]. A review of the studies of otelixizumab and teplizumab showed significant benefits in both high-risk T1DM and recent-onset T1DM patients. In high-risk patients, they delayed the time to diagnosis, preserved C-peptide levels, and improved metabolic parameters. Patients with developed diabetes maintained C-peptide levels and reduced insulin requirements for longer periods. This therapy heralds a new era of treatment, seems to be safe, and the side effects are self-limiting and transient [69, 70]. The inhibition of IL-12 differentiation by Th1 cells may be an effective means of inhibiting the development of type 1 diabetes mellitus [71]. A limitation of this therapy is critical Th1 function and side effects. Among the tyrosine kinase inhibitors, sorafenib is the most promising. An animal model showed that sorafenib inhibited the development of type 1 diabetes and may be a promising therapy for type 1 diabetes in humans [71].

Perspectives

Searching for methods of adequate preparation of transplantation of β cells, devoid of immunogenic effects, which would allow abandonment of the use of immunosuppressive drugs.Searching for cells for transplantation from renewable sources, cells capable of both self-renewal and multi-line differentiation. Hopes are also associated with obtaining cells and tissues using the somatic own cells of the transplant recipient, but this method also raises ethical controversies related to cloning methods.

The use of genetic engineering to inhibit the processes of autoimmunity and β-cell apoptosis, both in people at risk of developing diabetes and in patients after islet cell transplantation.

Conclusions

Recent years have brought a lot of research about the nature of type 1 diabetes and the mechanisms leading to its development. However, it has not been established which factors decide the time of initiation of autoimmunity and what determines the dynamics of these processes. Despite enormous advances in glycaemic control thanks to modern insulin therapy methods, no definitive cure for the disease has been found. There are many very different research programs underway, many of which give hope for a final positive solution. For now, however, it must be recognized that type 1 diabetes is still an incurable disease.

Notes

[1] Conflicts of interest Conflict of interests: none declared

References

1 

Lie BA, Todd JA, Pociot F, et al. The predisposition to type 1 diabetes linked to the human leukocyte antigen complex includes at least one non-class II gene. Am J Hum Genet 1999; 64: 793–800. 10.1086/302283.

2 

Klak M, Gomółka M, Kowalska P, et al. Type 1 diabetes: genes associated with disease development. Cent Eur J Immunol 2020; 45: 439–453. 10.5114/ceji.2020.103386.

3 

Blanter M, Sork H, Tuomela S, Flodström-Tullberg M. Genetic and Environmental Interaction in Type 1 Diabetes: a Relationship Between Genetic Risk Alleles and Molecular Traits of Enterovirus Infection? Curr Diab Rep 2019; 19: 82. 10.1007/s11892-019-1192-8.

4 

Dedrick S, Sundaresh B, Huang Q, et al. The Role of Gut Microbiota and Environmental Factors in Type 1 Diabetes Pathogenesis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020; 11: 78. 10.3389/fendo.2020.00078.

5 

TRIGR Study Group; Akerblom HK, Krischer J, Virtanen SM, et al. The Trial to Reduce IDDM in the Genetically at Risk (TRIGR) study: recruitment, intervention and follow-up. Diabetologia 2011; 54: 627–633. 10.1007/s00125-010-1964-9.

6 

Witsø E, Cinek O, Tapia G, et al. Genetic Determinants of Enterovirus Infections: Polymorphisms in Type 1 Diabetes and Innate Immune Genes in the MIDIA Study. Viral Immunol 2015; 28: 556–563. 10.1089/vim.2015.0067.

7 

Mukherjee N, Lin L, Contreras CJ, Templin AT. β-Cell Death in Diabetes: Past Discoveries, Present Understanding, and Potential Future Advances. Metabolites 2021;11: 796. 10.3390/metabo11110796.

8 

Redondo MJ, Gignoux CR, Dabelea D, et al. Type 1 diabetes in diverse ancestries and the use of genetic risk scores. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2022; 10: 597-608. 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00159-0.

9 

Wong FS, Tree TI. Historical and new insights into pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes. Clin Exp Immunol 2019; 198: 292–293. 10.1111/cei.13396.

10 

Wong FS, Tree TI. Historical and new insights into pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes (2). Clin Exp Immunol. 2021;204(2):165-166. 10.1111/cei.13597.

11 

Quinn LM, Wong FS, Narendran P. Environmental Determinants of Type 1 Diabetes: From Association to Proving Causality. Front Immunol 2021; 12: 737964. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.737964.

12 

Haller MJ, Atkinson MA, Schatz DA. Efforts to prevent and halt autoimmune beta cell destruction. Endocrinol MetabClin North Am 2010; 39: 527–539. 10.1016/j.ecl.2010.05.006.

13 

Hassan GA, Sliem HA, Ellethy AT, Salama Mel-S. Role of immune system modulation in prevention of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2012; 16: 904–909. 10.4103/2230-8210.102989.

14 

Thrower SL, Bingley PJ. Prevention of type 1 diabetes. Br Med Bull 2011; 99: 73–88. 10.1093/bmb/ldr020.

15 

Michels A, Zhang L, Khadra A, et al. Prediction and prevention of type 1 diabetes: update on success of prediction and struggles at prevention. Pediatr Diabetes 2015; 16: 465–84. 10.1111/pedi.12299.

16 

Abela AG, Fava S. Prenatal and early life factors and type 1 diabetes. Endocrine 2022; 77: 48–56. 10.1007/s12020-022-03057-0.

17 

Kordonouri O, Cuthbertson D, Belteky M, et al. Infections in the first year of life and development of beta cell autoimmunity and clinical type 1 diabetes in high-risk individuals: the TRIGR cohort. Diabetologia 2022; 65: 2098–2107. 10.1007/s00125-022-05786-3.

18 

Caramalho I, Rodrigues-Duarte L, Perez A, et al. Regulatory T cells contribute to diabetes protection in lipopolysaccharide-treated non-obese diabetic mice. Scand J Immunol 2011; 74: 585–595. 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2011.02627.x.

19 

Filippi CM, Ehrhardt K, Estes EA, et al. TLR2 signaling improves immunoregulation to prevent type 1 diabetes. Eur J Immunol 2011; 41: 1399–1409. 10.1002/eji.200939841.

20 

Ziegler AG, Achenbach P, Berner R, et al. Oral insulin therapy for primary prevention of type 1 diabetes in infants with high genetic risk: the GPPAD-POInT (global platform for the prevention of autoimmune diabetes primary oral insulin trial) study protocol. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e028578. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028578.

21 

Roep BO, Peakman M. Antigen targets of type 1 diabetes autoimmunity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2012; 2: a007781. 10.1101/cshperspect.a007781.

22 

Clemente-Casares X, Tsai S, Huang C, Santamaria P. Antigen-specific therapeutic approaches in type 1 diabetes. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2012; 2: a007773. 10.1101/cshperspect.a007773.

23 

Hoyne GF, Flening E, Yabas M, et al. Visualizing the role of Cbl-b in control of islet-reactive CD4 T cells and susceptibility to type 1 diabetes. J Immunol 2011; 186: 2024–2032. 10.4049/jimmunol.1002296.

24 

Kawada-Horitani E, Kita S, Okita T, et al. Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells prevent type 1 diabetes induced by immune checkpoint blockade. Diabetologia 2022; 65: 1185–1197. 10.1007/s00125-022-05708-3.

25 

Ríos-Ríos WJ, Sosa-Luis SA, Torres-Aguilar H. Current advances in using tolerogenic dendritic cells as a therapeutic alternative in the treatment of type 1 diabetes. World J Diabetes 2021; 12: 603–615. 10.4239/wjd.v12.i5.603.

26 

de Groot P, Nikolic T, Pellegrini S, et al. Faecal microbiota transplantation halts progression of human new-onset type 1 diabetes in a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2021; 70: 92–105. 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322630.

27 

Łuczyński W, Wawrusiewicz-Kurylonek N, Szypowska A, et al. Generation of T regulatory cells in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2012; 120: 101–109. 10.1055/s-0031-1284432.

28 

Rewers M, Gottlieb P. Immunotherapy for the prevention and treatment of type 1 diabetes: human trials and a look into the future. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 1769–1782. 10.2337/dc09-0374.

29 

Satin LS, Soleimanpour SA, Walker EM. New Aspects of Diabetes Research and Therapeutic Development. Pharmacol Rev 2021; 73: 1001–1015. 10.1124/pharmrev.120.000160.

30 

Foda BM, Ciecko AE, Serreze DV, et al. The CD137 Ligand Is Important for Type 1 Diabetes Development but Dispensable for the Homeostasis of Disease-Suppressive CD137+ FOXP3+ Regulatory CD4 T Cells. J Immunol 2020; 204: 2887–2899. 10.4049/jimmunol.1900485.

31 

Itoh A, Ortiz L, Kachapati K, et al. Soluble CD137 Ameliorates Acute Type 1 Diabetes by Inducing T Cell Anergy. Front Immunol 2019; 10: 2566. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02566.

32 

Toren E, Burnette KS, Banerjee RR, et al. Partners in Crime: Beta-Cells and Autoimmune Responses Complicit in Type 1 Diabetes Pathogenesis. Front Immunol. 2021; 12: 756548. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.756548.

33 

Bresson D, von Herrath M. Humanizing animal models: a key to autoimmune diabetes treatment. Sci Transl Med 2011; 3: 68ps4. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002102.

34 

Łuczyński W, Wawrusiewicz-Kurylonek N, Szypowska A, et al. Generation of T regulatory cells in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2012; 120: 101–109. 10.1055/s-0031-1284432.

35 

Marek-Trzonkowska N, Mysliwiec M, Dobyszuk A, et al. Administration of CD4+CD25highCD127-regulatory T cells preserves β-cell function in type 1 diabetes in children. Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 1817–1820. 10.2337/dc12-0038.

36 

Yin B, Ma G, Yen CY, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells prevent type 1 diabetes in murine models. J Immunol 2010; 185: 5828–5834. 10.4049/jimmunol.0903636.

37 

Wang S, Tan Q, Hou Y, Dou H. Emerging Roles of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Diabetes. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12: 798320. 10.3389/fphar.2021.798320.

38 

Gaglia J, Kissler S. Anti-CD3 Antibody for the Prevention of Type 1 Diabetes: A Story of Perseverance. Biochemistry 2019; 58: 4107–4111. 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00707.

39 

Ke Q, Kroger CJ, Clark M, Tisch RM. Evolving Antibody Therapies for the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes. Front Immunol 2021; 11: 624568. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.624568.

40 

Au KM, Medik Y, Ke Q, et al. Immune Checkpoint-Bioengineered Beta Cell Vaccine Reverses Early-Onset Type 1 Diabetes. Adv Mater 2021; 33: e2101253. 10.1002/adma.202101253.

41 

Ludvigsson J, Sumnik Z, Pelikanova T, et al. Intralymphatic Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase With Vitamin D Supplementation in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase IIb Trial. Diabetes Care 2021; 44: 1604–1612. 10.2337/dc21-0318.

42 

Tucker CG, Dwyer AJ, Fife BT, Martinov T. The Role of Programmed Death-1 in Type 1 Diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2021; 21: 20. 10.1007/s11892-021-01384-6.

43 

Zhang X, Kang Y, Wang J et al. Engineered PD-L1-Expressing Platelets Reverse New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes. Adv Mater 2020; 32 (26): e1907692. 10.1002/adma.201907692.

44 

Chellappan DK, Sivam NS, Teoh KX, et al. Gene therapy and type 1 diabetes mellitus. Biomed Pharmacother 2018; 108: 1188–1200. 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.09.138.

45 

Brown ML, Lopez A, Meyer N, et al. FSTL3-Neutralizing Antibodies Enhance Glucose-Responsive Insulin Secretion in Dysfunctional Male Mouse and Human Islets. Endocrinology 2021; 162: bqab019. 10.1210/endocr/bqab019.

46 

Mathieu C, Martens PJ, Vangoitsenhoven R. One hundred years of insulin therapy. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2021; 17: 715–725. 10.1038/s41574-021-00542-w.

47 

Khan AB, Ahmad A, Ahmad S, et al. Comparative Analysis of Inhaled Insulin With Other Types in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2022; 14: e23731. 10.7759/cureus.23731.

48 

Boggi U, Vistoli F, Andres A, et al. First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II–recommendations. Am J Transplant 2021; 21 (Suppl. 3): 17–59. 10.1111/ajt.16750

49 

Moskalewski S. Isolation and culture of the islets of langerhans of the guinea pig. Gen Comp Endocrinol 1965; 44: 342–353. 10.1016/0016-6480(65)90059-6.

50 

Sutherland A, Marson L. Pancreas transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2021; 36: 1997–1999. 10.1093/ndt/gfaa046

51 

Chen J, Gunton JE. Beta-cell function and human islet transplantation: can we improve? J Endocrinol 2021; 248: R99–R112. 10.1530/JOE-20-0590.

52 

Dugbartey GJ. Carbon Monoxide in Pancreatic Islet Transplantation: A New Therapeutic Alternative to Patients With Severe Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12: 750816. 10.3389/fphar.2021.750816.

53 

Marfil-Garza BA, Shapiro AMJ, Kin T. Clinical islet transplantation: Current progress and new frontiers. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2021; 28: 243–254. 10.1002/jhbp.891.

54 

Shapiro AM, Pokrywczynska M, Ricordi C. Clinical pancreatic islet transplantation. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2017; 13: 268–277. 10.1038/nrendo.2016.178.

55 

Shapiro A, Pokrywczynska M, Ricordi C. Clinical pancreatic islet transplantation. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2017; 13: 268–277. 10.1038/nrendo.2016.178.

56 

Helman A, Melton DA. A Stem Cell Approach to Cure Type 1 Diabetes. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2021; 13: a035741. 10.1101/cshperspect.a035741.

57 

Lorenzo PI, Cobo-Vuilleumier N, Martín-Vázquez E, et al. Harnessing the Endogenous Plasticity of Pancreatic Islets: A Feasible Regenerative Medicine Therapy for Diabetes? Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22: 4239. 10.3390/ijms22084239.

58 

Rao JS, Matson AW, Taylor RT, Burlak C. Xenotransplantation Literature Update January/February 2021. Xenotransplantation 2021; 28: e12685. 10.1111/xen.12685.

59 

Takaki T, Shimoda M. Pancreatic islet transplantation: toward definitive treatment for diabetes mellitus. Glob Health Med 2020; 2: 200–211. 10.35772/ghm.2020.01057

60 

Dinnyes A, Schnur A, Muenthaisong S, et al. Integration of nano-and biotechnology for beta-cell and islet transplantation in type-1 diabetes treatment. Cell Prolif 2020; 53: e12785. 10.1111/cpr.12785.

61 

Montanari E, Gonelle-Gispert C, Seebach JD, et al. Immunological aspects of allogeneic pancreatic islet transplantation: a comparison between mouse and human. Transpl Int 2019; 32: 903–912. 10.1111/tri.13445.

62 

Bellin MD, Dunn TB. Transplant strategies for type 1 diabetes: whole pancreas, islet and porcine beta cell therapies. Diabetologia 2020; 63: 2049–2056. 10.1007/s00125-020-05184-7.

63 

Ware J, Allen JM, Boughton CK, et al.; KidsAP Consortium. Randomized Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Very Young Children with Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2022; 386: 209–219. 10.1056/NEJMoa2111673.

64 

Fuchs J, Hovorka R. Closed-loop control in insulin pumps for type-1 diabetes mellitus: safety and efficacy. Expert Rev Med Devices 2020; 17: 707–720. 10.1080/17434440.2020.1784724.

65 

Breton MD, Kovatchev BP. One Year Real-World Use of the Control-IQ Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Technology. Diabetes Technol Ther 2021; 23: 601–608. 10.1089/dia.2021.0097.

66 

Wilson LM, Jacobs PG, Castle JR. Role of Glucagon in Automated Insulin Delivery. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2020; 49: 179–202. 10.1016/j.ecl.2019.10.008.

67 

Smigoc Schweiger D. Recent Advances in Immune-based Therapies for Type 1 Diabetes. Horm Res Paediatr 2022. 10.1159/000524866.

68 

Herold KC, Bundy BN, Long SA, et al.; Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Study Group. An Anti-CD3 Antibody, Teplizumab, in Relatives at Risk for Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 603–613. 10.1056/NEJMoa1902226.

69 

Frontino G, Guercio Nuzio S, Scaramuzza A, et al. Prevention of type 1 diabetes: where we are and where we are going. Minerva Pediatr (Torino) 2021; 73: 486–503. 10.23736/S2724-5276.21.06529-0.

70 

LeFevre JD, Cyriac SL, Tokmic A, Pitlick JM. Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies for the prevention and treatment of type 1 diabetes: A literature review. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2022; 79: 2099–2117. 10.1093/ajhp/zxac244.

71 

Zeng Q, Song J, Wang D, et al. Identification of Sorafenib as a Treatment for Type 1 Diabetes. Front Immunol 2022; 13: 740805. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.740805.

 
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.